There are two magazines my local Babies R Us carries and gives out free, American Baby and Baby Talk. I was in there the other day and picked both of them up. I finally had a chance to read Baby Talk last night.
There was an interesting article in the October 2008 issue about a family struggling with a Down Syndrome baby. They did not know prenatally that their little girl was Down, but found out after her birth. The family talked about how bittersweet it was: the joy of having a baby girl, so sweet and precious, mixed with the grief they feel over her difficulties. As a mom of a special needs baby, I could totally related and appreciate all they were going through. I really appreciated the magazine for shedding some light on this "less than ideal" situation.
The family named their daughter after the husband's grandmother who had "escaped and fought the Nazi's during the Holocaust" (pg. 50). Oh how sweet, you say! Get this, in the next paragraph the father says to the doctors, "If we had known, we would have terminated." (pg. 50)
Ummm, is it just me, or does something not seem right here? They would have terminated their baby based on the fact the she has Down Syndrome, yet applaud his grandmother for surviving the Nazis, who wanted to "terminate" her for her "unacceptable-ness"??!! I was just speechless and needed to read it again to make sure it said what I thought it did.
When we found out that Rachel would actually live, we asked Dr. Giles if we would not be encouraged to terminate. He said that we still had that choice and there were parents that would. We found that to be LUDICROUS!! The thought never even took enough root to be plausible.
I will be honest, it is difficult living with a child with "special needs" (and Rachel's needs aren't even that demanding right now), but the joy that I get seeing Rachel happy and smiling, the absolute joy that she brings to our life... nothing can terminate that.
Looking toward resurrection
7 years ago










